I'm sure most people understand economics to some degree. Lets say in the US most people make 20-50k yearly income and the top 0.5% make multiple millions a year. Now the government has a bright idea and decides to make online jobs that allow anyone who can connect to the internet to make 50 thousand dollars every hour or 8 million in a 40 hour work week. Then they decide to arrest and jail 90% of the people for doing just that because they had second thoughts or made a mistake. The other 10% kept their money because they flipped items on amazon or craigslist instead of taking the online jobs. After all the people who were arrested get out of jail they come back to an economy that has left them in the dust where the price of a gallon of milk went from $4 to $30. No one lost their day job because most people were in the same boat so they all go back to work making their 20-50k a year. The underlying factor is now instead of 0.5% of the population being the multimillionaires now 10% of the population are. The economy has shifted to accommodate the now 20x as many rich people as before while leaving the other 90% of the population with less than 10% of the countries wealth behind. That 90% decides to migrate to a country with a better economy and the US does not have enough people to sustain itself.
This scenario is more complicated than DN's issue, but the problem is very similar between the two. It may be in the game's and the company's best interest to rethink the way the "fix" was handled.
This scenario is more complicated than DN's issue, but the problem is very similar between the two. It may be in the game's and the company's best interest to rethink the way the "fix" was handled.
Comment