Disclaimer: I'm not good at Math, just so we are clear.
I recently noticed that there's been an on-going debate on DN FB Groups on whether we should use or not use jelly on enhancing items "DURING ENHANCEMENT BOOST".
Some people say to still use jellies to avoid our items getting destroyed when enhancing it.
Some (like me) are baffled why?
If the above picture is applicable, we should get 30% bonus enhancement boost.
The picture below shows the current enhancement rate for Tier 3 Calypse equipment.
If there's an 80% chance of success rate, enhancing it during enhancement boost will make it around 104%. (80 x 30%) + 80 = 104%
Probability of Equipment destruction will only be applied if the enhancement was failed. (Please refer to the picture below)
So logically (also mathematically) speaking, there should be NO ROOM FOR FAILURE. RNG should only kick in if the probability is less than 100% (like 99.9999%). But since the success rate is above 100% during enhancement boost, there's really no need to use Jelly.
Any thoughts about this? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
I recently noticed that there's been an on-going debate on DN FB Groups on whether we should use or not use jelly on enhancing items "DURING ENHANCEMENT BOOST".
Some people say to still use jellies to avoid our items getting destroyed when enhancing it.
Some (like me) are baffled why?
If the above picture is applicable, we should get 30% bonus enhancement boost.
The picture below shows the current enhancement rate for Tier 3 Calypse equipment.
If there's an 80% chance of success rate, enhancing it during enhancement boost will make it around 104%. (80 x 30%) + 80 = 104%
Probability of Equipment destruction will only be applied if the enhancement was failed. (Please refer to the picture below)
So logically (also mathematically) speaking, there should be NO ROOM FOR FAILURE. RNG should only kick in if the probability is less than 100% (like 99.9999%). But since the success rate is above 100% during enhancement boost, there's really no need to use Jelly.
Any thoughts about this? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
Comment