Dear all,
Here I am, offering my 2 cents based on a neutral standpoint.
I have extensively discussed ED’s decision with my guildmates and also my friends who have unfortunately been excluded from the latest notice (non-SG/MY/PH).
PS: I hope this hasn’t been shared yet; I didn’t manage to scroll through all the threads regarding this.
Firstly, it is critical that we identify ED as a full-fledged corporation that is bound by legal statements. That said, in view of their sudden release of the notice (couple this with NA), a backend agreement must have been made to make sure their operation standards are in line with their TOS. We, as players, often identify ED as an intermediary and may seem more personal to us than they actually are. ED is governed by their TOS and workflows, and their vision for the company is projected for the long run. Surely, as most people agree on, that the decision to exclude some SEA countries is questionable, but I seek your understanding that we do not see what’s behind-the scenes of ED. S**t may have happened internally which resulted in the drawing of such lines with the other countries.
This brings me to my second point. With the knowledge that DN Indo exists, albeit not as active as the current DN SEA, DN Indo is operated by a third party, much like how DN SEA was by CherryCredits. Although this speculation may be far fetched, but it’s logical for these exclusions to happen (at least for Indo) because: why else do we have DN Indo for? If there’s DN Indo for Indonesia players, why hop to DN SEA? Yes, I agree that DN Indo may be (are) less populated than us, and would not be as immersive as DN SEA due to lack of player traffic, hence they would prefer playing on DN SEA.
*I am using DN Indo as an example. There are alternatives for players from other countries to reach DN SEA*
Question to ED: Taking reference from your acquisition with Cherry Credits, are you able to take over DN Indo?
There’s a good chance that an external pressure is acting on DN as a whole. Otherwise, the notice would not/should not be this sudden.
Guys, I’ll urge you guys to take a step back and (painfully) try to understand from their perspective. What we see is a ridiculously short 1-month notice of termination. What we don’t see could be months of internal battling to even arrive at this junction. If this means a financial blow to ED, surely they would be against it. As much as we don’t want our peers to be disconnected from us, I’m sure they wouldn’t wish for this to happen too.
My guess is, this battle could have been ongoing for years, unbeknownst to us. They may have been closing one eye to allow non-SG/MY/PH to join us FOR YEARS. It’s a struggle for them as a company, to have to concede defeat, after allowing us the freedom to mingle internationally for so long. Let’s unite as players and try to understand both sides to this.
I sincerely hope ED can shed some light on their part, and to offer (abit more) transparency and accountability.
Players, please understand that this decision is way more painful to ED as a company than to us. They are dealing with their rice bowls, while we are dealing with virtual frustration. It’s harder to make such decisions than we think it is.
I’d like to add that this should have been implemented years ago, or as soon as this had to be done, not unless this was only discussed recently. On a positive note, we made friends that transcended geographical boundaries for so many years.
Please let me hear what you think after reading this.
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Jason
Here I am, offering my 2 cents based on a neutral standpoint.
I have extensively discussed ED’s decision with my guildmates and also my friends who have unfortunately been excluded from the latest notice (non-SG/MY/PH).
PS: I hope this hasn’t been shared yet; I didn’t manage to scroll through all the threads regarding this.
Firstly, it is critical that we identify ED as a full-fledged corporation that is bound by legal statements. That said, in view of their sudden release of the notice (couple this with NA), a backend agreement must have been made to make sure their operation standards are in line with their TOS. We, as players, often identify ED as an intermediary and may seem more personal to us than they actually are. ED is governed by their TOS and workflows, and their vision for the company is projected for the long run. Surely, as most people agree on, that the decision to exclude some SEA countries is questionable, but I seek your understanding that we do not see what’s behind-the scenes of ED. S**t may have happened internally which resulted in the drawing of such lines with the other countries.
This brings me to my second point. With the knowledge that DN Indo exists, albeit not as active as the current DN SEA, DN Indo is operated by a third party, much like how DN SEA was by CherryCredits. Although this speculation may be far fetched, but it’s logical for these exclusions to happen (at least for Indo) because: why else do we have DN Indo for? If there’s DN Indo for Indonesia players, why hop to DN SEA? Yes, I agree that DN Indo may be (are) less populated than us, and would not be as immersive as DN SEA due to lack of player traffic, hence they would prefer playing on DN SEA.
*I am using DN Indo as an example. There are alternatives for players from other countries to reach DN SEA*
Question to ED: Taking reference from your acquisition with Cherry Credits, are you able to take over DN Indo?
There’s a good chance that an external pressure is acting on DN as a whole. Otherwise, the notice would not/should not be this sudden.
Guys, I’ll urge you guys to take a step back and (painfully) try to understand from their perspective. What we see is a ridiculously short 1-month notice of termination. What we don’t see could be months of internal battling to even arrive at this junction. If this means a financial blow to ED, surely they would be against it. As much as we don’t want our peers to be disconnected from us, I’m sure they wouldn’t wish for this to happen too.
My guess is, this battle could have been ongoing for years, unbeknownst to us. They may have been closing one eye to allow non-SG/MY/PH to join us FOR YEARS. It’s a struggle for them as a company, to have to concede defeat, after allowing us the freedom to mingle internationally for so long. Let’s unite as players and try to understand both sides to this.
I sincerely hope ED can shed some light on their part, and to offer (abit more) transparency and accountability.
Players, please understand that this decision is way more painful to ED as a company than to us. They are dealing with their rice bowls, while we are dealing with virtual frustration. It’s harder to make such decisions than we think it is.
I’d like to add that this should have been implemented years ago, or as soon as this had to be done, not unless this was only discussed recently. On a positive note, we made friends that transcended geographical boundaries for so many years.
Please let me hear what you think after reading this.
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Jason
Comment